Frogs exhibit a great diversity of reproductive modes, from laying aquatic clutches of hundreds of eggs that receive no further attention, to complex parental behaviours, some of which are displayed by poison frogs (Dendrobatidae). These frogs take care of their small terrestrial clutches, and then take the newly hatched tadpoles to bodies of water where they complete their development until metamorphosis. In the dyeing poison frog, Dendrobates tinctorius, parental care is performed by males, and the sites chosen for tadpole deposition are predominantly tree-holes, where I have found between one and 18 tadpoles of this species at the same time. This is counterintuitive, considering the high incidence of larval cannibalism. It has been suggested that phytotelmata for tadpole deposition are a limited resource in the forest, and that is why males take tadpoles to occupied sites. But, what if the males could deposit their tadpoles in empty sites?
Strange parental decisions and cannibalism
I carried out an experiment at Les Nouragues station (French Guiana) where I tested whether, given the choice of an unoccupied and an occupied container, fathers would choose to deposit their tadpoles in the unoccupied site. To my surprise, the larger the tadpole in the occupied container, the greater the probability of a male depositing its new tadpole in that container (Rojas 2014). This, which seems at first glance a strange parental decision, could not necessarily be a bad thing. A large tadpole could mean the presence of resources for tadpole development in a particular site. The new tadpole might be eaten by the large one, but if it is not, it has better chances to complete its development in a place with good resources!
Maternal provisioning of alkaloids
I have teamed-up with two fabulous poison frogs researchers, Jenny Stynoski (Colorado State University) and Lisa Schulte (Free University of Brussels) in a hopefully long-term collaboration that we have decided to name “Team Tadpole”. Our first joint project aims to explore maternal alkaloid provisioning in several species of poison frogs from a phylogenetic perspective.
Within-pool relatedness and tadpole distribution at different spatial scales
An ongoing collaboration with two other great poison frogs researchers, Eva and Max Ringler (University of Vienna), aims at understanding how males of the dyeing poison frog distribute their tadpoles from the same or different clutches in the pools available. For this purpose, we are carrying out both spatial and genetic analyses (using microsatellites). This will provide insights into the species’ space use, but also on the degree of relatedness among tadpoles deposited in a given pool, which is key to a better understanding of the drivers and correlates of larval cannibalism.